Tag Archives: writings

Not So Much A Talking Cat

The Admiral had found a particularly fascinating episode of ‘Extreme Trams’ on Youtube and was glued to his monitor. It wasn’t such an unusual state for The Admiral and it was best not to interfere, as this was preferable to his frequent bouts of boisterousness.

“Don’t you have any milk?” I said, trying to find things to combine that might result in a refreshment.

“On the fridge,” he said.

On the fridge? You know milk ought to be stored in the fridge in order to keep it cold.”

“Ordinarily, yes,” he replied. “But I was experimenting and it’s now behaving like a reverse hotplate.” I ran a finger over the fridge’s surface and sure enough a layer of frost had developed. The milk was practically stuck to it.

I heard a scratching at the front door followed by a thin high-pitched voice, as if a ten-year-old had been compressed within a shoebox. I thought it might be Cyndi Lauper.

“Could you put a little milk in that saucer?” said The Admiral, rising and, without removing his gaze from the monitor, stepping to the front door. For a shoebox, it was large and had very long hair. And whilst its skulking demeanour was typical of its species, it had a most unusual cry.

“Noooo,” said the cat, in a plaintive monotone.

“Yeeees,” said The Admiral.

“Noooo,” said the cat.

“Yeeees,” said The Admiral.

“Excuse me,” I said. It’s not that I wasn’t bemused by an apparently talking cat, but I felt if this was the level of debate we were going to have, I might as well watch Scottish Questions. “Since when do you have a cat?”

“It’s not mine,” said The Admiral. “I believe he belongs to that chap around the corner.”

“What kind of person teaches their cat to speak?”

“I think you’ll find,” said The Admiral, “that the results of most experiments with verbal communication in cats have tended to be negative. This is not so much a talking cat as one with an unusual pronunciation of the word ‘meow.’”

“But when you said ‘yes’, he said ‘no.’”

“That’s not really a conversation though, is it? More like a Beatles song. Were I to ask him about Boyle’s Law, he’s unlikely to explain that, assuming temperature remains unchanged, the absolute pressure and volume of a confined gas are inversely proportional.”

“Isn’t that just because he didn’t study thermodynamics?” I said.

“Hmm,” said The Admiral. “Admittedly, he may have spent more time on Kinetic Theory. Why don’t you try talking to him?”

“Ok. What’s his name?”

“I don’t know,” said The Admiral. “Let’s call him Boyle.”

I crouched down to welcome the visitor. “Hello, Boyle,” I said, and immediately felt ridiculous.

“Noooo,” said the cat.

“Would you like some milk?” I poured a little into the saucer.

“Noooo,” said the cat, rushing towards it and eagerly lapping it up.

“You see?” said The Admiral. “His response is not necessarily negative. In fact, we don’t even know if he is speaking English. Were he a native Pole, this would actually mean ‘yes’. Or were he Japanese it would mean ‘of.’

“He’s multilingual?” I said.

“I don’t think you’re quite grasping this,” said The Admiral, doing his best to hear an explanation of electrical conduits whilst continuing our discussion. “He’s just an eccentric verbaliser, a bit like yourself.”

“But he must have been trained to talk like that.”

“Actually,” said The Admiral, “I believe it may be the other way round. The chap around the corner is quite the curmudgeon and I suspect the cat has trained him to take a negative view of life. He may have become so accustomed to hearing the word ‘no’ that it now plays a huge part in his daily discourse. In which case, Boyle has a lot to answer for, don’t you, Boyle?”

“Noooo,” said the cat.

It was a very intelligent cat who could not only speak several languages but had trained his master to behave in such a manner. I began to have some sympathy for the man who had simply been conditioned, and it made me wonder about those whose only notion of positivity is to continually repeat that we are positively screwed.

Not So Much A Talking Cat

In which Tony and The Admiral encounter a feline with an unusual pronunciation of the word ‘meow.’

More Writing >>

Trident Nuclear Submarine Fleet For Sale

Following reports last weekend that the UK’s replacement nuclear submarine fleet had severe problems which effectively made it unfit for purpose, I thought somebody should do the only sensible thing and offer it for sale on Ebay. As the fleet was not really mine to sell, I did it on behalf of UK defence minister, Philip Hammond, who should really have thanked me for showing such initiative.

Item 271106131104 was listed under Collectables > Transportation > Nautical > Military as:

Nuclear submarine fleet. One previous owner. Reason for sale: riddled with construction and design flaws. Some corrosion. Painfully slow. A few holes. Faulty periscopes so you won’t be able to see the surface without making an appointment. Nuclear monitoring instruments are the wrong type so possible exposure to radiation. Has been known to cause psychological problems in crew members. HMS Astute has a couple of dents because we grounded it off the Isle Of Skye. Hey ho.

Bought it from a guy called Boaks for £9.75bn a few years back but it’s just not quite what I had in mind. Will settle for a couple of grand o.n.o.

Delivery: collection or alternatively can send second class post.

Eagle-eyed viewer Doug Daniel, currently in the market for a fleet, immediately spotted the item location was listed as ‘London.’ This was due to Ebay’s assumption that the item resided with its vendor, ‘ministryofdefence’, at Main Building, Whitehall, London SW1A 2HB. Had they asked for the location of the actual item, I’d have said ‘currently festering somewhere around HM Naval Base Clyde, Faslane, Helensburgh G84 8HL.’ Clearly it’s absurd to think that a nuclear submarine fleet could be stored in Whitehall. That’s what Scotland’s for.

Bidding, beginning at 99p, was robust, but sadly the seven-day auction was cut short by around five days and twelve hours when another eagle-eyed viewer, this time Ebay, decided my fleet wasn’t really ‘Collectable’ at all and pulled the plug. But not before the page racked up several thousand views and I had the chance to answer a raft of questions from eager bidders desperate for a hunk of useless metal. For a change, I did not make these up.

Q: How do we know you’re actually the Ministry Of Defence?

A: I have a badge and I’m not very bright.

Q: Can I see your badge?

A: No.


Q: I presume these items are boats of some description. Will they fit in my swimming pool? I have a very large swimming pool and would like to expand it.

A: As you know, submarines are designed to operate under water. However, these will be under water before you even switch them on, as they leak. If you’re going to expand your swimming pool, expand downwards.


Q: Can I do a test launch before I bid? Thx

A: If you have a month to spare. Last time we tried it, after a week I could still see all the crusties at the protest camp. Then we ran aground. Good times.


Q: You send to Nigeria? I am very honest man, honestly. My uncle has just died, he was Prince Nadjer al Grabbem. He left me lot’s of money, all I need are your bank account details and your 4 digit pin and I will transfer to you all the money.

A: I read about your uncle. He should have known that hair-tongs were never intended for such a purpose, god rest his soul. Bank account details on their way.


Q: Will you dispatch immediately or will you wait till 2014 when you will be forced to get shot of them?

A: As I said, they’re not much use to us here, so reckon you could have them for Christmas. Happy Holidays!


Q: I feel that by purchasing this item & at the same time demanding foreigners in the middle east & Asia be forced to stop their nuclear programs I may feel a little bit hypocritical after purchase. Can I return this item if suddenly develop some morals towards humanity?

A: What am I, your mother? Do you want to nuke or not?


Q: As you have zero possitive feedback – does this suggest that you are not to be trusted? Do you have a holding company? Who is the boss? I would be reluctant to part with 99p with any confidence.

A: Is your mistrust based on the grounding of HMS Astute? If so, it really wasn’t such a big deal. We covered up far worse.


Q: We might be interested up here in Shetland. Once Scotland gets Independence, we’ll need nuclear capability to keep them away from our oil and money. Can you chip the missiles to lock onto Holyrood? Could be interested in a few Eurofighters, too.

A: I like the way you think. Shetland, this could be the start of a beautiful friendship.

Trident Nuclear Submarine Fleet For Sale

Following reports that the UK’s replacement nuclear submarine fleet was unfit for purpose, I thought somebody should do the sensible thing and offer it for sale on Ebay. (First published at National Collective.)

More Writing >>

Muriel Gray’s Parrot

There was an unusual squawking sound coming from within The Admiral’s flat. The last time I remember hearing anything similar was when LaFlamme had agreed to give The Admiral a haircut. It was an ill-judged move on his part, as LaFlamme kept her shades on and held a glass with a sherry-like substance in it throughout. The results, however devastating, were short-lived because as everyone knows, a haircut is just for Christmas and not for life.

The squawking continued as I stepped tentatively into the kitchen-office. On the ex-boardroom table where The Admiral conducted his greatest bodges sat a large multi-coloured vertebrate. Initially I mistook this for a bouquet of flowers but as the incongruity of a vase of flowers in The Admiral’s office sunk in I realised something was afoot. This was clinched when the vase of flowers spoke.

“Who are you?” said the bird.

“Tony.”

“Hello Tony.”

I was somewhat taken aback by this, as it was already more conversation than I would normally expect at The Admiral’s.

“I appear to be stuck,” said The Admiral, from the other side of the room. He had most of his upper body crammed into a large wire enclosure on the kitchen worktop and for a moment I wondered if there had been a body-swap incident, as he is usually the one perched on the table. I wasn’t sure whether he was trying to get in or out, but I held the back of the cage and let him decide.

“Thank you,” he said, removing himself and dusting off the flakes of wood-shavings from his sleeves. “I’m looking after the little chap and it was time to clean his cage.”

“Who does he belong to?” I asked.

“My friend Muriel,” said The Admiral. “You know. Journalist. Lots of opinions.” He said this in a way which suggested she might be dangerous. “He’s not generally any trouble, but he’s most particular about the materials with which I furnish his lodgings.”

“Correct gauge of shavings, or what?” I asked.

“Underneath the shavings,” he replied, “is a lining of four or five layers of newspaper and I’ve been told on no account to use the Daily Record.”

The parrot piped up. “Utter pish,” he said. The animal’s use of the Scottish vernacular was striking.

“Why on earth,” I asked, “would a parrot object to the Daily Record?”

“Utter pish,” repeated the parrot.

“Well, parrots are among the most intelligent of birds,” said The Admiral. “I can only assume that the quality of journalism within its pages is simply not up to his high standards.”

“But he’s only going to crap on it,” I said.

“Nevertheless,” replied The Admiral. “He does not deem it worthy. Apparently it was only a matter of days with said paper before he insisted on crapping on The Scotsman instead.”

“Bollocks,” said the parrot.

“But soon he also became dissatisfied with The Scotsman.”

“Bollocks,” repeated the parrot.

“Then there was only one paper good enough for the little prince.”

“Which was?” I asked.

“The Herald,” said The Admiral.

“It’ll have to do,” said the parrot.

“The Herald?” I said.

“It’ll have to do,” repeated the parrot.

It probably said something for the quality of Scottish journalism that this most discerning of readers could only find one quality newspaper and even then it was to defecate on. I can only imagine the foul language had he been raised in Dundee.

I asked The Admiral what could have sparked such disdain for the papers in question.

“Perhaps he used to write for them,” said The Admiral, without a hint of sarcasm. I concluded that it was a possibility. “In any event, you’re perfectly welcome to ask him directly.”

I turned towards the parrot. “So, um.. the Daily Record and The Scotsman..”

“Utter pish bollocks,” said the parrot.

It wasn’t the most eloquent of arguments but then I wasn’t the most eloquent of guests and didn’t particularly fancy debating the merits of Scottish print journalism much further. Besides, he was starting to win me over with his passionate and forthright take on the subject.

“I think I remember your friend Muriel,” I said to The Admiral. “Better get him back in his cage before he starts boffing on about Munros.”

Muriel Gray’s Parrot

In which Tony Boaks and The Admiral encounter a most vocal critic of Scottish journalism.

More Writing >>

A CAUSE FOR ALARM

The Admiral showed me a new contraption he’d cobbled together from discarded pieces of circuitry and an old record player. In essence it was an alarm clock. At the specified hour, the device would spring to life, activating the turntable and lowering the stylus arm onto the record. Result – you woke up to the gentle sound of a Chopin sonata or koto music from Japan. He hadn’t tried it yet but assured me it would be 100% effective.

I doubted whether the invention would ever be commercially viable, what with its need for discarded pieces of circuitry and an old record player, but the Admiral countered that my use of the word ‘viable’ was pejorative, whatever that means.

We left his flat to find the nearest purveyor of vigorous dark ale and spent several hours testing degrees of vigour before the barman called time. At this point the Admiral stood, briefly, then sat down again. He stood a second time and buttoned his cardigan, badly, leaving an extra button dangling at the bottom. He sat down once more and suggested we try again, heartily, only this time that I should do the standing. It seemed only fair so I stood, abruptly, knocking over both chair and table and, attempting to retain a shred of diginity, blaming him.

There was a limit to how far we would get in such a condition and it was decided that, the Admiral’s flat being nearest, it would be far enough if I could reach his sofa. En route to the sofa The Admiral explained he had an early start, as he had a couple of days’ work at the hospital devising a way of keeping tags on runaway patients. He said it would be an opportunity to test his new alarm clock and were it not for runaway patients he would have no use for such a gadget.

“I’m going to make doubly sure I don’t sleep in,” said the Admiral, his last words of the evening as he set the device for 7am and left me muttering incomprehensibly about kotos.

I slept as if consigned to a morgue but was awoken by the gentle stirrings of Motorhead’s ‘Ace of Spades’ at a level likely to have been set at the Admiral’s last party. It was a testament to his electronic ingenuity that the device actually worked, but it didn’t work for long as a high velocity boot was soon to be seen heading towards it from the direction of the sofa.

A Cause For Alarm

In which Tony Boaks and The Admiral conduct some experiments with vigorous dark ale.

More Writing >>

The Special Powers Of Tormentil

I met LaFlamme at the Botanical Gardens. “It’s a fecund paradise,” she said. Her language was quite shocking at times.

We were on a semi-furtive mission to procure a cutting from a particular herbaceous perennial, the name of which continues to escape me despite The Admiral’s repeated tellings. The Admiral had been researching an apparently highly effective hangover cure which depended on the leaves and stem of the plant. Early tests with a garden centre variety were hampered by our collective inability to keep anything in a pot alive apart from fungus, and it was decided that growing a little guy from scratch might bring out a parental instinct that would help discourage him from dying.

“Mental torment,” I said. “Mental torment. Mentalent. Mentalor. Mentament.”

“What are you doing?” said LaFlamme.

“This is how I remember the name,” I replied. “I start with mental torment then combine the words in different ways until it comes back to me.”

“How do you remember mental torment?” said LaFlamme.

“Mental torment comes naturally to me. Talmanent. Talmator. Talmanentator. Talmanenta-latertater.”

“Tormentil.”

“Tormentil,” I said, nodding. “I would have gotten there eventually.”

“Maybe,” said LaFlamme, “but I wasn’t sure how much mental torment I could take.”

We found an uncharacteristically useful piece of graphic design in the form of a signpost. It read ‘Herbaceous Perennials.’ This led us to a winding path on a shallow incline towards an extensive rockery. When the incline turned steep, my own incline was to turn back but LaFlamme was two paces ahead of me and I was blinded by her milky-white calves.

As the incline levelled out, we rounded a corner and LaFlamme stopped abruptly, forcing the top of my head to collide with her back. It had long been my dream to collide with LaFlamme but this wasn’t quite what I had in mind. I peered round from behind her elegant frame to find a well-groomed, middle-aged gentleman with fine, thinning hair. He had secateurs in one hand, a cutting in the other, and wore an expression of utter guilt. He froze in a half-turned position, as if unsure whether to make the full 180 or return to base. Either he too was blinded by the fullbeam effect of LaFlamme’s legs or he was up to no good.

“Phlobaphenes,” he said. It was an unusual opening gambit and suggested the latter.

“Do you work here?” asked LaFlamme.

He hesitated before replying in a painfully hesitant whine: “Yes?”

“Why are you wearing a suit?” I asked.

“I try to be presentable at all times?” he said, again offering his reply in question form as if testing how much we were willing to believe. “It shows the plants due respect?”

When I stepped out from LaFlamme’s shadow, something I’m unable to do often, I recognised the man. It was gourmet, bon viveur and Martini devotee, Suave Gav, who I’d met at a winemakers convention. I was only there because I designed a flyer for one of the exhibitors and thought there’d be freebies. But Suave Gav was altogether more serious. He was taking notes.

“Armstrong,” he said, extending his secateurs. “Gavin. I believe we may have met previously. To be perfectly honest, we extract phlobaphenes and triterpene alcohol from the Potentilla Erecta. It produces a rousing Bavarian liqueur called Blutwurz.” It was certainly plausible that the plant he was interfering with could produce a rousing Bavarian liqueur. Less plausible was the idea that scholarly botanic types called it Potentilla Erecta. But they did. Go ahead, look it up.

“Potentilla Erecta?” said LaFlamme. “That does sound rousing. Does it have any special powers? You know, increased circulation, hot flushes, shortness of breath, panting, drooling?”

“Oh yes,” said Armstrong. “Its health benefits are well documented. A compound prepared from the roots and bark has been used to treat a number of ailments from headaches to pimples. It’s often used in herbal medicine as an astringent due to its tannin content.”

“Anything else?” asked LaFlamme.

“Yes,” he replied. “Prepared rather differently, it can give you a thumping great erection.” This was evidently the answer LaFlamme was looking for, and she giggled with delight.

I stepped towards the herbaceous bush and viewed its accompanying signage. ‘Potentilla Erecta,’ it read. ‘Common name: Tormentil.’ So this was the elusive shrub The Admiral asked us to track down for his dubious and very likely fruitless experiment. It was nothing to look at. Its straggly low-lying leaves seemed banal and its weak yellow flowers a bit uninspiring. I wondered if it might feel much the same about me. Skinny, it would say, not very tall individual with pale skin and a heavy frown that won’t be forgiving in middle-age. Probably ought to quit moping and take some exercise.

But whatever we made of each other’s appearance, it was a multitalented plant that could both cause a hangover and cure it, not to mention having the combined powers of Aspirin, Clearasol and Viagra. It was a wonder there wasn’t a queue of impotent spotty migraine sufferers all desperate for a hair of the dog.

The Special Powers Of Tormentil

In which Tony and LaFlamme first encounter deviant gastrophile, Suave Gav.

More Writing >>

ScotVoices

Last week, I was asked to curate @ScotVoices, the rotating Twitter account featuring a different Scot each week. I was delighted to be asked, although it was probably naïvety on their part. They gave me a set of guidelines. I didn't read them. They said people follow the account to find out about Scotland. I told them I was used to having huge amounts of fun at the expense of others and was ideal ambassador material. They let me wade right in.


Monday

I thought it was only fair to offer some sort of mini-disclaimer in case there were timid souls amongst the ScotVoices crowd.

SCOTVOICES-INTRO

By the time I made it over to the interactions tab there were already a few welcoming words.

SCOTVOICES-WELCOME

And this query from noted Scotsman columnist/problem, Euan McColm.

SCOTVOICES-MCCOLM

Which was dealt with promptly. SCOTVOICES-MCCOLM4

I explained that I was the man who tried to sell a fleet of Trident nuclear submarines on Ebay, that I’d set up Regional Collective: Artists and Creatives Against Independence on behalf of Alistair Darling, and was now best known for National Collective’s Sunday Cartoons, of which this was the latest.

In case that didn’t clarify my position on Scottish Independence, I went further:

SCOTVOICES-GOVE1

And, continuing the Gove theme:

SCOTVOICES-GOVE2

Later, in trying to explain how we arrived at the title ‘Tony Boaks Versus The Union’, I felt it would be sensible to ask:

SCOTVOICES-GOVE3

However, it was the following innocuous exchange which appeared to cause a problem:

SCOTVOICES-TUBA

At that point, this happened:

SCOTVOICES-UNFOLLOW

I believe it may have been the first tuba to ever break the camel’s back. But I wasn’t too worried because at the same time there was this:

SCOTVOICES-FOLLOWERS

After more prodding by The Scotsman’s McColm, it occurred to me that certain elements of the press might love nothing better than a ‘National Collective Guy Loses Temper, Says Something Regrettable on ScotVoices’ story.

SCOTVOICES-MCCOLM2

But that was never likely.

SCOTVOICES-MCCOLM3

 


Tuesday

Having spent Day One upsetting No campaigners, confusing Americans and alarming National Collective, I tried to avoid politics.

SCOTVOICES-POEM

That lasted about ten minutes. I didn't sign up to Twitter to talk about basket-weaving.

SCOTVOICES-PANDAPRINCE

Much conversation ensued. The general consensus was that pandas were vastly preferable to princes, and I got the distinct impression that the ScotVoices crowd considered our royal family to be a bunch of expensive duds.


Wednesday

Today there were voices expressing concern at my ‘politicising’ ScotVoices.

SCOTVOICES-SUCKSASS

I believe the expectation was that, being part of National Collective, I should be discussing wish trees, knitting & Icelandic goatherding. I thought about trying to placate them, then decided against it.

SCOTVOICES-INDYREFQ

Well, let me tell you, the account went like a steamtrain for the rest of the day and I pretty much sat back and let them get on with it.

SCOTVOICES-INDYREFQ2

The results of this ludicrously unscientific poll were as follows:

SCOTVOICES-RESULTS

Amongst the No responses, one foretold - in great subsequent detail - how it would lead to Bosnian-style violence:

SCOTVOICES-BOSNIA

Another described it as “silly” and continued:

SCOTVOICES-INDYREFQ3

I said The Scotsman would tend to agree with her - their editorials generally announce 'Scottish Independence: What's The Point?' every day of the week. Surprisingly, on hearing this, up popped The Scotsman’s assistant editor, Nick Eardley.

SCOTVOICES-SCOTSMAN1

That he felt this was something he should rise to defend made me think there was doubt in his mind, so I offered a suggestion for the following day's leader:

SCOTVOICES-SCOTSMAN2


Thursday

At this point in the week I am generally wondering what to draw for the Sunday Cartoon. As Rose Garnett wasn’t around, I dressed up my bone-idleness as a ‘collaborative group project’ and asked the ScotVoices crowd for ideas.

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ1

Initially it was slim pickings, with the only possibility being 'Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre riding a dinosaur with naked lassies on a rocket ship blasting into Ed Miliband's bum' (@Masterwiggins). However, I had to turn this down as nobody has ever seen Paul Dacre.

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ2

This had a galvanising effect and the suggestions came thick and fast. It reminded me that there’s nothing like abuse for getting things done.

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ3

Some of these weren’t even that bad, and gave me the sense that the Tory Party Conference should feature. When this message arrived however, my heart sank:

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ4

I had become ‘the guy who draws Blair McDougall in a funny wig.’


Friday

I awoke with an overwhelming sense of dread. I was having a serious cartoonist’s block and all I could do was blame others for the predicament:

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ5

My weekend, on the other hand, was likely to involve more tiresome Bacchanalian feasting and the occasional raising of my weary head from the bosom of some maiden to draw speech bubbles.

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ6

I spent the rest of the day doing everything I could to avoid the issue. I complained that I didn’t really want to be a cartoonist and my current situation was entirely the fault of Scotland On Sunday’s Kenny Farquharson.

SCOTVOICES-FARQ1

At which point, in stepped the man himself.

SCOTVOICES-FARQ2

Which @Gknollington saw right through:

SCOTVOICES-FARQ3

This of course was all displacement activity. Eventually, I was rumbled.

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ7


Saturday

The situation was now critical. I had made a big deal about producing a collaborative Sunday Cartoon and here I was on Saturday without a single idea in my head. I couldn’t very well say ‘You know that cartoon we were discussing? Not going to happen.’

I wasted even more time with a #ScotVoicesWisdom thread, hoping something would come up.

ScotVoices

But ScotVoices readers were not fooled. This was ‘bawbaggery of the highest order’ (@johnferguson88).

Mercifully, at this point Rose Garnett arrived and poured a sherry-like substance into two glasses.

“What’s the story?” she asked.

“Tory party conference,” I replied.

“What do you have so far?”

“’It's Raining Bastards.’”

She shot me a glance so icy that I thought I might turn to stone. A painful ten minutes passed while she got to grips with the details.

“It’s not that the Tories don’t care about losing Scotland,” she said finally. “It’s just that they think there’s no chance of it happening.”

This was something of a eureka moment for me, and five minutes later I was able to announce the following:

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ8

And several hours later, this:

SCOTVOICES-TOONQ9


Sunday

SCOTVOICES-ANNOUNCING

You can see the finished piece here.

So what had I learnt from my week’s incarceration at ScotVoices Tower?

SCOTVOICES-CONCLUSIONS1

As if to confirm that this was indeed the case, The Scotsman's McColm reappeared.

SCOTVOICES-CONCLUSIONS2

But nobody paid him any attention. I was on a roll.

SCOTVOICES-CONCLUSIONS3

Finally, I signed off with this:

SCOTVOICES-CONCLUSIONS4

For more abuse & information on all-body home-perming kits, follow me @gregmoodie.

@ScotVoices And Me

Last week, I was asked to curate @ScotVoices, the rotating Twitter account featuring a different Scot each week. I was delighted to be asked, although it was probably naïvety on their part.

More Writing >>

Regional Collective: Artists And Creatives Against Scottish Independence

By Alistair Darling

Now look. I only got into this because of that Joyce McMillan and her ‘all the artists are voting Yes’ nonsense. This may or may not be true, but if it is, it’s because Alex Salmond promised them a washing-free independent Scotland. If he’d said independence meant getting out of bed sober before noon and looking presentable, they’d very soon come around to Better Together.

Of course there are Scottish artists who support the UK. There must be. Just because I haven’t met any doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Admittedly we’re lacking any equivalent of that dreadful National Collective and their woeful bleatings about wishing trees and Icelandic goat herders. Even their cartoons are poor. I haven’t been in a single one of them. Better Together’s lack in this regard may not necessarily be a bad thing. Do you really want 500 Questions dressed up as an extended prose poem? Or a demolition of the SNP’s currency plans in rap?

But not to be outdone, I have taken the initiative and set up a new website, Regional Collective – Artists and Creatives Against Scottish Independence, as a platform for No-voting artistic types. You know who you are, even if I don’t. Let this be a starting point for a new flourishing of anti-independence bile in the creative arts.

Why me, I hear you ask. Well, somebody has to do it. I may not be much of an artist but I’m certainly creative. As Chancellor of the Exchequer, I was the one who bailed out the banks with your money, a hugely imaginative act which I’m sure would never have occurred to any of you; I’ve flipped for Britain, having designated four properties as my second home in four years; and I claimed parliamentary expenses for a flat that I let out whilst also claiming living allowances for Downing Street. I’d like to see Alan Bissett try that.

So, on to the website. My first challenge was to design a logo. Now, my understanding of typesetting is that you should use as many different colours and styles as possible but stick to well-known fonts such as Comic Sans and Brush Script for maximum effect. Hence, my first effort:

Regional Collective2

The result of this was that I had to get Ian Taylor to pay National Collective for the logo at the top of the page. We may not have any design sense but we certainly have a truckload of cash, and in politics that’s what counts.

What about the actual content of the site? Well, let’s start with photography. And just to show we can do Icelandic goat-herders as well as any secessionists bent on breaking up Britain, here’s a man with a bucket:

Regional Collective3

I’m not seeing any ice in this particular shot but I’m led to believe the most amazing results can be achieved with Photoshop. Whether that extends to painting in a grassroots artists’ collective that doesn’t exist remains to be seen.

Next – a poem in the Scots tongue:

But pith and power, till my last hour, I’ll mak this declaration; We’re bought and sold for English gold, Such a parcel of incredibly dedicated and hard-working public servants in a nation.

Perhaps the biggest challenge for the website would be in the field of illustration as, unlike photography and poetry, it requires some skill. I set out with pencil and paper, thinking a self-portrait might give the site a little character:

Regional Collective4

And so it did. It gave it a little character with bushy eyebrows waving a flag. Once again, I had to get Ian Taylor to pay National Collective for the portrait below, even though I’m not convinced it’s a particularly true likeness.

Regional Collective5

If this exercise proves nothing else, we’ve shown we can keep National Collective in work.

One final point. Let it never be said that Better Together are offering a politics of fear rather than any kind of positive vision. Of course we’re offering a positive vision – if you vote Yes, you’re positively screwed.

Now, calling all No-supporting artists. Are you there? Hello?

Ok, call me.

Regional Collective: Artists And Creatives Against Scottish Independence

Now look. I only got into this because of that Joyce McMillan and her ‘all the artists are voting Yes’ nonsense. This may or may not be true, but if it is, it’s because Alex Salmond promised them a washing-free independent Scotland. If he’d said independence meant getting out of bed sober before noon and looking presentable, they’d very soon come around to Better Together.

More Writing >>

Troll

Readers of The Scotsman will be aware that trolling is unique to supporters of independence. VILE ABUSIVE CYBERNATS are generally what’s wrong with the world today whilst saintly No campaigners are too busy knitting Better Together cardigans to ever pick fights.

Personally I’ve never understood why anyone from either side would want to post inflammatory messages online in order to provoke others into heated arguments. I have Unionist friends for that. If you really have enough time to devote an entire afternoon to self-righteousness (as I found out, trolling is time-consuming), presumably in order to feel better about yourself, you might want to step out into the daylight and question why you don’t have a girlfriend.

It was this very lack of understanding of the troll’s motivation that made me conduct some experiments this week. I very soon realised that being a successful troll is not as easy as it looks. It requires patience, commitment and of course an ability to wade swiftly through screeds of utter drivel.

These are just a few of the real conversations I had on Twitter with No campaigners.

No campaigner: Stop the EU’s plan to break up the UK!
Me: How can I get involved?
No campaigner: (Sends link to UKIP site.)
Me: Should I be renouncing the BNP at this stage in the game? I mean, changing horses midstream and all that.
No campaigner: Absolutely renounce them. They are against trade and cooperation with Europe. We are only against a political union.
Me: Ok thanks. And I’d be able to join UKIP even though I’m a bit.. you know?
No campaigner: What?
Me: Well, I was never an actual member or anything.
Me: But I have a swastika tattooed on my forehead. Would that be a problem?

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

No campaigner: Latest bombshell – title deeds may be null and void in indy Scotland. First your savings, then your pension, then your house – game’s up SNP.
Me: I’m going to lose my house?
No campaigner: You could. The SNP don’t know. Vote no.
Me: That’s terrible. Even though we have a separate legal system that pre-dates the act of union? How’s that going to work?
Me: I mean, that’s not scaremongering or anything, is it?

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

No campaigner: Making the positive case for the Union, one doorstep at a time. Funded by real people, not lottery winners.
Me: Are you saying the lottery winners aren’t real people?
No campaigner: If they weren’t, the SNP would have to make them up. No-one else would fund this shambles.
Me: They looked pretty substantial to me. Of generous proportions, even.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

No campaigner: Post 2014 I’d name new Forth crossing ‘The Union Bridge’ in celebration of #indyref victory.
Me: I didn’t understand what you meant at first and then I realised. The union between the Lothians and Fife, right?
No campaigner: No, The Union Bridge in honour of the first democratic ratification of the United Kingdom.
Me: The whatty whatty what of the what?
No campaigner: You know what I mean, when Scots vote ‘Feck off Alex’ next year.
Me: We’re going to become Irish?
No campaigner: and Welsh and English.
Me: I see. Is ‘The Ulster Unionist Bridge’ really the best name we can come up with though? I mean, maybe something snappier?
No campaigner: Perhaps.
Me: Will I have to wear a bowler hat to cross it?
No campaigner: It was firstly a Game Keeper’s hard hat. So perhaps if heading north to the moors?
Me: There’ll be a game-keeper at the other side? In a bowler hat? Like passport control?

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

At this point I realised my trolling was not being hugely successful. The No campaigners caught on to my trolly-ness and stopped feeding me, and of course if you don’t feed the troll, he dies.

I was beginning to lose heart and thinking I might not be cut out for the trolling business at all. I could either duck out now before serious bad karma set in or up my game and perhaps take more time reeling in my campaigners. I decided on the latter.

No campaigner: Imagine if 5 million Blacks got together and demanded an indyref to break UK but you were excluded from vote as you aren’t Black?
Me: Come again?
No campaigner: What if any UK group the size of ‘Team Yes’ got together and demanded a separate state? Excluding you from vote.
Me: Black people should decide the indyref vote?
No campaigner: Should any minority group within a Union get to vote to break up a Union whilst excluding other union members from a vote?
Me: You mean like Poles For Independence or suchlike?
No campaigner: Yes, if any minority group got together to create their own State.
Me: Like if the Poles wanted to break up the union but didn’t let the Blacks have a say?
No campaigner: But didn’t let anybody other than Poles have a say.
Me: Where do the Asians fit into all this?
No campaigner: Questioning 5 million Brits that are calling for indyref that will break up a 60m strong UK Union only allowing 10m to vote.
Me: Do gays have a say in your plan?
Me: But no gingers, right?
Me: Do you also agree that the big-boned shouldn’t be allowed to fund political campaigns?
Me: Speaking of funding: (Sends link to National Collective’s donations page.)

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

This exchange was so spectacularly stupid that for a time I thought the No campaigner was trolling me. I was pleased that I managed to draw out his deranged idea in some detail but still I believed I was probably the worst troll ever. I hadn’t really managed to wind anyone up and one campaigner even said he was ‘enjoying my Socratic pedantry’. I explained that there was no point in continuing if he was enjoying it. Even worse, I thought I was experiencing symptoms of Stockholm Syndrome and starting to empathise with the No campaigners. I even bought a UKOK hat.

But just when I was ready to throw in the towel, the following genius appeared on my timeline:

No campaigner: Nationalism is an ideology best suited for a people who are being oppressed, not for a people who live in a free nation.
Me: Do you think we should oppress the Scots in order to justify their nationalism? Maybe get them to bugger off sooner?
No campaigner: Who is them?
Me: The uppity Jocks, of course. You agree they’re a problem, yes?
No campaigner: yes I do think separatists/nationalists are a problem!
No campaigner: I always say if Germany can ban/investigate far-right parties that may pose a threat…
No campaigner:…then why can’t the UK government do the same to defend the nation’s union?
Me: Surely there’s a difference between the Nazis and the Nats though, no? I mean what are the chances of the Nats invading Poland?
No campaigner: They won’t destroy Poland but they want 2 destroy the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
No campaigner: Nazis/far-Right groups pose a threat to Germany as much as nationalists/separatists pose to Britain.
Me: If true, that’s terrible. Wouldn’t people like you and I be deemed intellectuals?
No campaigner: What? What are you getting at? Who would deem us?
Me: Well, as you say, the Nats pose as much threat to UK as far right to Germany. If Nats have their way..
Me:..the Greater Scotlandic State will probably want rid of all sorts, and intellectuals might well be top of their list.
No campaigner: Is that what they’re calling it?
No campaigner: I think if they had a list, they might start with the 70%+ unionists that will be voting NO.
Me: Then you and I are doubly screwed. Hell, if we were gay Jewish gypsies, that would be a full house.
No campaigner: Well, that is where we must learn from history…
No campaigner:…that if a group is determined to case destruction to both a nation’s sovereignty and society then they must be stopped!!
Me: Wouldn’t banning them just force them underground?
No campaigner: Better underground where they can’t make, effect or change policies and borders!
Me: Ok. Re threat to sovereignty, what do we tell those who say sovereignty in Scotland resides with the people & not parliament?
No campaigner: We stand up and tell them “tuff!” and that this country belongs to the crown and has no room for traitors in HRH governments.
Me: Awesome, thanks. You don’t mind if I publish this conversation, do you? It’s really helped me.
No campaigner: Publish it, what for?

Troll

Readers of The Scotsman will be aware that trolling is unique to supporters of independence. VILE ABUSIVE CYBERNATS are generally what’s wrong with the world today whilst saintly No campaigners are too busy knitting Better Together cardigans to ever pick fights. (First published at A Thousand Flowers. National Collective refused to have anything to do with it.)

More Writing >>

Workfare for MPs

One of the main reasons Scottish unionist MPs are so desperate to keep the UK together is self-preservation. Post-independence, they’ll have no say in Westminster matters and with no affiliation to Holyrood, unlike MSPs, they’ll have no say there either. They’re going to be out of work.

As there are 59 Scottish seats in the Westminster parliament and 41 of them are held by Labour, it’s not hard to see who’ll be dealt the majority of the p45s. This could be a problem for the Scottish Government, as seeing Jim Murphy wandering the streets around Holyrood with his face tripping him would dampen anyone’s spirits.

Unfortunately, finding a solution might not be so straightforward. Most unionist MPs are unfamiliar with the concept of real work and if you handed them a shovel they’d probably ask what it was. Obviously, being unemployable is no hindrance if you intend to join Lord Foulkes in the upper chamber. But what if you want to be useful instead?

Let’s ignore the possibility that some, incensed at Scotland having chosen independence, might refuse to have anything to do with their native country. Instead, we’ll assume that self-preservation and love of limelight win out and that the redundants agree to make the most of it, albeit through gritted teeth and near-continuous whining.

First off, if they intend to remain in Scotland, they’ll find they belong to parties which don’t yet exist. Actual Scottish parties will have to be formed which don’t depend on being told what to do by Westminster. This could be challenging for many.

Some might hope to be parachuted into a safe seat south of the border. But as, in their own words, they’d be considered foreigners in the remainder of the UK, this could be problematic. It’s really only an option for Scotland’s last surviving Conservative MP, David Mundell, because one Tory more or less in England won’t be noticed.

For the rest, it means fighting through a selection process, competing with each other and standing in elections which they have no guarantee of winning – having told the electorate that they were rubbish for so long, the electorate have taken to returning the compliment.

In other words, even for the successful ones, getting back to work is going to take time. They could be unemployed for years in the interim period and still have no actual skills at the end of it.

That’s why I’m advocating a new Workfare scheme for former Scottish MPs. I know that this type of scheme has had terrible press and would not normally be considered by the Scottish Government. But as the vast majority of the MPs in question prefer to play by Westminster rules, it seems only fair to introduce, solely for their benefit, a system which they allowed to pass into law for the rest of us.

How it would work:

Following a Yes vote, there will be 18 months of deliberation whilst unionist MPs continue to draw a salary and ask each other whatever happened to the West Lothian question.

On independence day, some sort of severance package may be agreed, although the Scottish Government could avoid any part in this by retroactively introducing legislation, again in keeping with Westminster rules, to avoid having to make any payouts.

The former MPs will then be expected to stack shelves, mop floors and complete other menial tasks without payment for large profit-making businesses in order to gain references and experiences of the “working world”.

One MP who will not have to take part in the new scheme is the member for Glasgow South West, Ian Davidson. Davidson has been in several high-profile videos recently, and with his light and breezy charm, producers have marked him out as a natural for television. A new sitcom, “I’m not angry, I’m effing furious” is due to air in September 2014 when his light and breezy charm should be at a peak.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcvhS-G8WNA&feature=youtu.be/

In conclusion, unemployment is not funny unless it happens to an MP.

Workfare for MPs

One of the main reasons Scottish unionist MPs are so desperate to keep the UK together is self-preservation. Post-independence, they’ll have no say in Westminster matters and with no affiliation to Holyrood, unlike MSPs, they’ll have no say there either. They’re going to be out of work.

More Writing >>

What Would You Miss About Westminster?

According to The Herald, Better Together plan to ‘step up debate in 2013’ by asking Scots what they would miss about Britain should Scotland vote for independence. Aside from the matter of Anas Sarwar showing us what their idea of stepping up debate looks like, who said anything about leaving Britain? Britain is an island, and even the most optimistic Yes voter knows removing Scotland could be tricky. You might as well ask what we’d miss about the sky.

Why not ask ‘what would you miss about the United Kingdom?’ or more specifically ‘what would you miss about Westminster?’ I’ll tell you why not. Because nobody cares about them. They don’t resonate in the public subconscious the way the word ‘Britain’ does. Britain’s the land of The Beatles, Matt Lucas and Team GB, and in the run-up to the referendum you’re not likely to be given a chance to forget it. Expect to see the line between Britain and the United Kingdom deliberately blurred, because opponents of Scottish independence are counting on you not to know the difference.

What they want you to think:

Britain/United Kingdom: Interchangeable.

Westminster: Seat of government and the only possible place for proper decision-making.

The facts:

Britain: Island.

United Kingdom: Political union.

Westminster: Home of Scottish Questions, a half-hour pseudo-debate where our sole Conservative MP, David Mundell, speaks on behalf of Scotland to a restless house eager to get on to more important matters.

It’s not possible for Scotland to leave Britain, just as it’s not possible to “lose our culture” through a political re-arrangement. What we’re leaving is a political entity.

The political entity is called the United Kingdom and it has a famous flag. The flag gets mistaken for the flag of Britain, but it’s the flag of the union. It has a lot to answer for, but it’s also become a weird kind of fashion symbol across the globe. It’s unusual amongst fashion symbols in that it’s indescribably ugly, but nonetheless it’s everywhere. Even Cubans have it on their handbags. Probably serves us right for all those Che Guevara t-shirts.

If you show the flag to an American and say that’s where you’re from, they’ll probably ask if you know Austin Powers. If you have no flag and say you’re from the United Kingdom they’ll probably ask where you learned to speak such good English.

The United Kingdom has a parliament. It’s called Westminster. It’s a bit like our parliament, but with ermine and rituals. Scotland doesn’t really need ermine and rituals and it doesn’t really need Westminster either. If we wanted to antagonise Europe and suck up to America we could do it ourselves.

Ah, Westminster. How I’ll miss you. Your pomp. Your splendour. Your pointless, unelected lords. You’re a monument to a bygone age. An age of empire, class divisions and privilege. But no matter that the Office for National Statistics has declared us the most unequal nation in Europe; according to Better Together, this is “as good as it gets.”

On Twitter, I asked the people who really matter – my fellow plebs, the Scottish voters – ‘what would you miss about Westminster?’ Most popular response was ‘nothing’, but that wasn’t going to help me write this article. So I kept prodding as I need all the help I can get. Here are the runners-up, which I may or may not have tweaked.

Governments we didn’t vote for.

Posturing on the world stage pretending we have an empire.

Pointless wars.

Trident missiles that will never be used, except accidentally.

Irrational antipathy towards Europe.

Chronic toadying to America.

Eagerness for US-style healthcare that even the US doesn’t want.

Dismantling of the welfare state.

Privatising everything that isn’t physically nailed down, despite the disastrous effects on the rail network and the utilities.

Having to pay for lords’ duckhouses and moats.

Lords.

MPs too busy scaremongering on independence to vote against welfare cuts.

Michael Gove.

Ah, Westminster. You refuse talks on independence then complain that Holyrood doesn’t have all the answers. You warn we’ll be a pound worse off under independence, unaware that most of us would happily pay more just to be rid of Gove. Your Scottish MPs claim they’ll be “looking out for Scotland”, but only once you eject them. You call Holyrood “a dictatorship” and illustrate exactly why we stopped voting for your parties. You say a Yes vote would put 19 hundred thousand billion jobs at risk. You say nobody will like us and we’ll be left sitting in a corner crying.

Yes, Westminster, I’ll miss your carping. But most of all I suppose I’ll miss your vision of a 21st century United Kingdom: joyless, unfair, unimaginative & frightened.

There is light at the end of the tunnel, Yes people. And with the Section 30 bill passed, Westminster’s role in the referendum process is over. Altogether now: ‘Missing you already!’

- See more at: http://nationalcollective.com/2013/01/22/what-would-you-miss-about-westminster/#sthash.pGKOcxiv.dpuf

What Would You Miss About Westminster?

According to The Herald, Better Together plan to ‘step up debate in 2013’ by asking Scots what they would miss about Britain should Scotland vote for independence. Aside from the matter of Anas Sarwar showing us what their idea of stepping up debate looks like, who said anything about leaving Britain?

More Writing >>

All text and images are copyright Greg Moodie. Do not use without express permission.